FT Executive Education Rankings 2020: methodology and key

This is the 22nd edition of the Monetary Situations rankings of the world’s top providers of customised and open-enrolment govt instruction programmes.

The customised position features the best 85 organization educational institutions — these are programs customized to the training demands of the organisations that fee them. The 2nd position comprises the best 75 educational institutions for open-enrolment programmes — programs on specific subjects, these kinds of as management, that are directed toward experts irrespective of their employer. A third, merged position lists the best fifty educational institutions for govt instruction, calculated from the customised and open tables.

Educational institutions using portion need to be internationally accredited by both Equis or AACSB and have acquired revenues of at the very least $2m in 2019 from both their customised or open-enrolment non-degree programmes. This year, a full of 107 educational institutions took portion in both or both rankings.

The position of customised system providers is compiled working with information from the organization educational institutions and their corporate consumers in 2019. Every faculty need to nominate a bare minimum of twenty consumers. At the very least five of them need to entire the FT study for a faculty to be eligible for the ultimate position.

The FT study was finished by 1,a hundred thirty five organization faculty consumers this 12 months — a response rate of fifty six per cent. Every rated their programme on a ten-level scale in accordance to a range of indicators. Their responses instantly inform the initial ten of the ranking’s criteria, from system style and design to observe-up and long term use, which account for a merged 80 per cent of the ranking’s weight.

Shopper responses are weighted in accordance to programme variety. Customers choose a single of a few alternatives to categorise their programme: strategic (sent to best management and developed to influence a company’s way) standard (sent to management on operational aspects of a firm) or practical (relevant to a specific purpose, these kinds of as internet marketing). Strategic programmes have the premier weighting and hence the best effect on the position.

Responses are also weighted in accordance to the seniority of the personal accountable for specifying the system, the dimensions of the shopper organisation and the quantity of educational institutions with which that shopper has commissioned customised programs in the previous a few decades.

The very last five criteria are calculated from info furnished by educational institutions on worldwide consumers, abroad programmes, development, partner educational institutions and faculty variety.

The open-enrolment position is compiled working with information from system providers and individuals who finished their nominated management programmes in 2019. Educational institutions submit one or two standard programs of at the very least a few days in size and a single or two advanced programs of at the very least five days. At least twenty per cent of these programmes’ members need to entire the FT study, with a bare minimum of twenty finished surveys, for a faculty to be considered in the ultimate position.

A full of 5,480 members answered this year’s open programme study — a response rate of 37 per cent — rating features of their system on a ten-level scale. Responses by advanced and standard-level members are merged to estimate the initial ten position criteria.

These criteria, which contain the quality of the members, of the educating and the relevance of the abilities they obtained, inform 80 per cent of the position. University information are employed to estimate the remaining criteria on female and worldwide members, development, worldwide site and partner educational institutions.

For both rankings, info gathered in the previous two decades is employed, wherever available, to estimate criteria knowledgeable by shopper and participant responses. If a faculty has participated for the previous a few decades, the weighting is 40:33:27, with 2020 information counting for 40 per cent. If two decades of info is available, the weighting is fifty five:45, with 2020 information accounting for fifty five per cent.

The weightings accorded to the initial 9 and ten criteria in the customised and open rankings, respectively, are decided by the level of value consumers and members connect to each and every in their surveys for the 2020 position. Weightings for these criteria hence range a little from 12 months to 12 months.

Educational institutions that attribute in both rankings are eligible for the merged in general position. The best fifty educational institutions are calculated in accordance to an equal weighting of the full scores achieved in both rankings, relatively than an ordinary of position positions.

Judith Pizer of Pizer-MacMillan acted as the FT’s databases guide

Important: Customised-enrolment programme

(weights for position criteria are proven in brackets as a share of the in general position)

The initial ten criteria, up to and together with “Future use”, are centered on information from the providers that commissioned govt programs.

The up coming five are centered on information documented by organization educational institutions. Educational institutions are rated for each and every of these criteria. The very last classification, “Total responses‡”, is for info only and does not inform the position.

Figures in brackets present the weight each and every criterion contributes to the in general position. The weighting accorded to the initial 9 criteria, from preparing to price for income, accounts for 80 per cent of the full ranking’s weight. It is decided by the level of value that consumers connect to each and every.

Preparing (eight.three): level of interaction involving shopper and faculty, the extent to which clients’ concepts had been integrated into the programme, and the performance of the faculty in integrating its newest research.

Programme style and design (eight.4): versatility of the system and the willingness of educational institutions to complement their faculty with exterior gurus.

Educating methods and materials (7.9): extent to which educating methods and supplies had been modern day and appropriate, and bundled a ideal combine of tutorial rigour and sensible relevance.

College (eight.4): high quality of educating and the extent to which educating team labored jointly to present a coherent programme.

New abilities and discovering (eight.three): relevance of abilities obtained to the workplace, the ease with which they had been applied, and the extent to which the course encouraged new techniques of imagining.

Adhere to-up (7.three): extent and performance of observe-up provided right after the system members returned to their workplaces.

Aims achieved (eight.4): extent to which tutorial and organization anticipations had been met, and the high quality of feed-back from personal members to system commissioners.

Services (7.4): rating of the discovering environment’s high quality and comfort, and of supporting assets and amenities.

Benefit for income (7.7): clients’ rating of the programme’s style and design, educating and supplies in terms of price for income.

Foreseeable future use (eight.): likelihood that consumers would reuse the exact faculty for other customised programmes in the long term, and no matter if they would recommission the exact programme.

Global consumers (5.): centered on the share of consumers with headquarters outside the house the organization school’s base state and location.

Overseas programmes (2.): worldwide attain of the school’s customised programme educating.

Advancement (5.): centered on the in general development in revenues from customised programmes as well as the development in revenues from repeat organization.

Husband or wife educational institutions (three.): amount and high quality of programmes designed or taught in conjunction with other Equis or Affiliation to Progress Collegiate Educational institutions of Organization (AACSB) accredited organization educational institutions.

College variety (5.): variety of faculty faculty in accordance to citizenship and gender.

Overall responses: quantity of personal surveys finished by the school’s consumers. Figures in brackets point out the quantity of decades of study information counted toward the position.

Important: Open up-enrolment programme

(weights for position criteria are proven in brackets as a share of the in general position)

The initial ten criteria are centered on information from programme members the up coming six are centered on information submitted by the organization educational institutions. Ranks are proven for each and every of these criteria, apart from “Female participants”, which demonstrates the share. Figures in brackets present the weight each and every criterion contributes to the in general position. The weighting accorded to the initial ten criteria, from preparing to amenities, accounts for 80 per cent of the full ranking’s weight. It is decided by the level of value that members attach to each and every.

Preparing (7.7): provision of advanced info on programme written content, and the participant assortment system.

Study course style and design (eight.six): versatility of the system and appropriateness of class dimensions, construction and style and design.

Educating methods and supplies (eight.three): extent to which educating methods and supplies had been modern day and appropriate, and bundled a ideal combine of tutorial rigour and sensible relevance.

College (eight.7): high quality of the educating and the extent to which educating team labored jointly to present a coherent programme.

Quality of members (7.9): extent to which other members had been of the appropriate managerial and tutorial standard, the worldwide variety of members and the high quality of interaction amid friends.

New abilities and discovering (eight.7): relevance of abilities obtained to the workplace, the ease with which they had been applied, and the extent to which the system inspired new techniques of imagining.

Adhere to-up (7.three): level of observe-up provided right after members returned to their workplaces, and networking chances with fellow members.

Aims achieved (eight.4): extent to which personal and experienced anticipations had been met, and the likelihood that members would recommend the programme.

Foods and lodging (six.eight): rating of the high quality of food and lodging.

Services (7.six): rating of the discovering environment’s high quality and comfort, and of supporting assets and amenities.

Female members (2.): share of female system members.

Global members (three.): centered on the share of members from outside the house the organization school’s base state and location.

Global site (2.): extent to which programmes are operate outside the house the school’s base state and location.

Advancement (5.): centered on the in general development in revenues from open programmes as well as the development in revenues from repeat organization.

Husband or wife educational institutions (three.): amount and high quality of programmes taught in conjunction with other Equis or AACSB accredited organization educational institutions.

College variety (5.): variety of faculty faculty in accordance to citizenship and gender.